Voting time is here!

Hello blog, today we could see a new face in Washington. Estimates from 40 seats to 70 seats could be lost for Democrats on Tuesday causing the Republicans to regain control.

However, most people expect this to happen, even the Democrats and the president himself. The president and many other Democratic leaders say they will be willing to work with Republicans ending partisanship (for now). And while they keep saying they will work with them and that they are confident that they will do so Mitch the Turtle Man has...other ideas. Recently our friendly turtle said the primary goal of Republicans is to make Obama a one term president.

BAFFLED, I-I don’t know what to say to that. Unemployment is near 10%, bad debt, dwindling value of the American dollar.

Who's that surprised though? Isn't it every politician’s goal to become president? Putting forth their own agenda for how they will get that power in the oval office is pretty expected. Unlike, you know, moving this country forward like they say they will do. I like the guys that say they will do it, but don’t. But I hate the third party candidates who say they will and will do it.

Speaking of third candidates, how about Lisa Mur...ma?...Me?...the chick from Alaska.
Who's had some weird polls out in Alaska, sometimes tied with Joe, other times blowing him out of the water, and times where the Democratic candidate is beating both of them.

Lisa Murkowski

And in the shifty tactics of the Joe Miller fans, you can register as a third party candidate. In fact a conservative talk show encouraged people to. That way you will get a massive stack of names for writing in Lisa.

Another wacked out election is of course the Nevada race. Did you know that on the ballot there will be a "Neither Harry or Sharon" Option? In fact, Reid hopes it will let him win. In the past few days he has said if you don’t want to vote for me vote for the neither.

Another frustrating fact for liberals is registered voters favor Democrats across the board by 5 points. However, when polled on the ones likely to vote instead, of registered, Republicans were favored +4 across the board.

I kinda wonder what will be said in a few months from now from the Liberals who decided “Yeah, let's not vote tomorrow, no big deal anyway.”

As the joker would say "It's a strange, strange world we live in".

Not So Small Government

Greetings blogspotters...okay, bad name. Anyway, you always hear about Conservatives always claiming to be Small Government.

No you're not! Sorry, you’re not for small government.

You ask them, do you want a bigger Military?

Most likely they will answer yes.

Do you want more police? Most likely they will answer...yes.

How they claim to be for small government when they support these two things being bigger is beyond me. If that doesn't tell you they aren't for small government look at some of their plans coming soon.

Investigation of miscarriages to make sure there’s no "foul play". What's a bigger invasion by the Government than having your own pregnancy investigated?

Other ideas include tracking illegal aliens having children and pretty much deporting them after the pregnancy. While I'm discussing illegal aliens, does anyone find it ironic how some of these pro-lifer candidates want to track illegal aliens having children in hospitals? Doesn't that just discourage immigrants from going to hospitals to get their child delivered? I thought they cared about the wellbeing of children in ALL circumstances and yet they are aiming to prevent these children from getting a proper delivery.

(Still completely off topic) I had a revelation. I may stop the ownage of the tea baggers. I point out the inconsistencies often, but when you’re as crazy as some of these candidates does it really matter if you're inconsistent?

Back on the topic at hand, let's not forget wire tapping. Nothing says “Small Government” like having your phone tapped. (I caught them once listening in on me, heard Cheney breathing on the third line myself.)

Let's also link another value of conservative land…Fiscal Responsibility? All the terrorist programs you want to fund? You have agencies to try and protect us from all types of terrorist attacks. But, no complaints there, just hand over the tax money for that and not for any kind of Social Security, Healthcare, unemployment or anything like that right?

So to wrap things up. Conservatives, you’re not some far off entity that can’t even compare to a liberal. You’re closer than you think except on Social Issues

The only noticeable difference I see other than Social Issues is you want to cut programs from our taxes that actually DO benefit us.

You both fund dumb programs that almost none of us benefit from.

Can’t cut some of those unnecessary high cost, no result programs, cut social security, and while you’re at it still complain about Obama.

Complain hard even when/if you win house and senate.

Complain and when you do make the changes intelligent people are actually foreseeing.

The morons who bought your crap will jump back to the Democratic side by 2012.

When you're behind that Damn Palin and lose.

Then you will complain EVEN MORE.

TangentX on...

McDonald's Monopoly game::

Anyone go to McDonald’s lately. Not I, but I have a friend that has been going every single day for the past week or two peeling off those Monopoly stickers trying to create a match.

Every single day for Lunch, and you know McDonald’s, the bigger the order the more stickers. And we all know they make one really common just to excite you and then make the other one reallllyyy rare. Like the million dollar one. Park Place is the most common and Boardwalk is almost non-existent.

Suckers

ObamaCare campaigning:

I know in Kansas this is getting stupid, really stupid. I'm fairly certain this is happening elsewhere too. You know those stupid Campaign Ads that just list what they’re not really for but appear to be for and they will just go out at the end or in the middle and say "By the way, Mr. Schneeglebopper supported Obama Care". It's like they said they killed your dog or something. Just shut up about it. It's not going to make me vote for you either.

Oh look Joseph Effin’ Stalin is an evil guy but his opponent supports Obama care and that’s the lowest of the low, better vote for this Stalin guy.

No No No

Abbreviations:

I'm starting to see a increase in people using texting abbreviations and now it's spilled into terminology and actual meaningful words.

You know the classic lOl and LMAO. But now people are abbreviating damn sentences.

I'll leave you with this

G T F M K R E

I'll let you decide what i just said.

Kansas Values:

This is a local thing. I'll have to try to find an ad where it mentions it. I'm not sure if it happens in other states. Can anyone verify that? Do people in Ohio run around saying "I live on Ohio Values" but anyway what in the world is Kansas Values?

I’ve lived in Kansas my whole life. I don’t know any special “values” we have that separates us from other states, honestly. We’re a pretty solid red state just like the others to the south or west of us. Other than knowing how to plant wheat really well and produce mass quantities of it, I don’t know anything about "Kansas Values".

Conservative kids:

I found this post on a forum board a little while ago. Just some fifteen year old brainwashed kid who has no idea what he's talking about.

I did not alter this post:

Those liberals there a bunch of commies, in Europe they have big goverment and high taxes because there a bunch of socialists. thank i am American in the conservative land of USA where we have gods freedom.


Enough said.

TangentX out

I'm back...and the world is still messed up.

Hello Blog, nearly a billion blogging years ago, I left to get my internet provider changed and in that time (a week) we had the usual hilarious campaign ads.

The downright crazy Sharon Angle “Look, it's a Mexican” ad.

And this gem from a California (or Carlyfiorina if you’re crazy) candidate.



While they all will be lined up sometime later this week for me to dig into, I want to talk about something I saw earlier.

I was with the family at Dillions. (A Kansas market trying to take down the Evil Wal-mart) Anyway, we went to checkout and I noticed before I walked out an older man who was sacking the items we purchased. He looked over sixty to me. I glanced at his name tag, his name was Lou, and he has worked at this store since 1997.

I started thinking about how potentially; if the Republicans get the house, want to scratch Social Security. (Oh wait, maybe now they don’t since they won the Republican ticket for their respective states.)

I know people, notably Republicans, hate paying taxes and they should. I'm sure I'll hate paying taxes when I reach that point in my life. Why I'd hate taxes is because what I'm paying into never really benefits me or anyone around me. But one of the few things -- like Social Security -- that people DO benefit from, they want to scratch.

Now the big thing Republicans always talk about on Social Security is how it's going to drive us bankrupt or destroy us. Yet, on a recent poll, a majority realizes this but at the same time didn't want to pay taxes. However, there’s also over 30% who don’t want to pay taxes BUT WANT Social Security to stay.

Yeah, I'm going to complain and see how high the debt in this country goes, but at the same time I don’t want to pay taxes for it. You see, it's this kind of stupidity and not contributing to my own society to complain about the deficit, but not wanting to make the sacrifices to get us out of it that will one day...make us all Lou's.  Working when we are so old that our arthritic hands can barely keep up.

And republicans want to raise retirement age to 70?!

It seems to me we'll be working until we croak. Throwing away something like Social Security for a guy who's probably been doing labor jobs for 3/4th's of his life, you tell me how that’s right.

Gone fishing

No, not really. But I will be away this weekend. See you back here middle of next week.

Till then, keep fighting the good fight.

Tangent X

Oops! He did it again.

Well, Bill O'Reilly did it again!

Of course most of you heard about how on The View he told the country Muslims attacked us on 9/11. This raised the testosterone levels of the entire set to record highs before Whoopi stormed off!

This is about as funny as when they debated about whether or not the Earth was round.

Sorry, getting sidetracked. (It’s the ADD) Nonetheless, O'Reilly was correct. Muslims technically attacked us on 9/11. However, when there’s a clear and more accurate and narrowing term for them of course O’Reilly will call them by that term.

He chooses to condemn and an entire group instead of, preferably – oh, I don’t know –

Al Queda!

Here’s an example. Since this blog has been plagued with the Phelps’ lately, I'll feed Fred again. If the Westboro church protested another Military Funeral and the press was to actually make a story about it would they put “BAPTISTS’ PROTEST FUNERAL”?

No they wouldn't because they'd call them by a more narrow term like “Insane Westboro Bigots”.
But O'Reilly has done this all the time, what else would be new?

What I'm disappointed with was how The View responded to it by walking away. What does that do? Just walking away? Of course people will say they were so disgusted that they left.

What about the O'Reilly fans though? I'll give you a quote:

“Yeah, Bill O'Reilly told the truth and Whoopi and Behar did not like it.”

I got this off a forum I found talking about this kind of stuff. There pretty much claiming a win just as I thought they would.

When someone leaves and walks off like that you look weak. It's that simple. Only time it works is if there’s a fire or some Iranian journalist is about to throw a shoe at you.

Same goes for Rand Paul at his debate. The same old Aqua God came up in the debate and he got offended and said "How Dare you?!" over and over like a broken down tape recording.

He wouldn't bother shaking his hand afterwards either…and you know just how far we have fallen in this country on politics. We'll probably see some poorly funded campaign ad about Rand Paul not shaking hands

RAND PAUL...HE SUPPORTS THE LEGALIZATION OF WEED...AND ALSO DID YOU KNOW HE DOESN'T LIKE TO SHAKE HANDS?!

Since we are speaking of Campaign Ads, it must also contain the words:
HE ALSO LIKES OBAMA CARE!

How many times do I have to see a campaign just point at each other with both candidates saying?
“OH YEAH…Well… you…Like Obama Care!”

I mean you could probably say you’re a Neo Nazi, a racist who wishes to jail all Black people, and wish to make church Mandatory on Sundays.

The response....WELL YOU SUPPORT OBAMA CARE and the crowd will be in shock. Shocked, I tell you! Not about the Nazi statement but that he supported Obama Care.

Wow, I really got sidetracked on this one. Better stop while I’m not ahead.

Till my next tangent…

Hate speech and freedom of speech: do they go together?

Fred Phelps

TheWestboro Baptist Church, our unfriendly hate driven bigots from down the lane, are currently in a court case, for protesting a funeral for a soldier. You know the fringe philosophy they hold dearly, Military deaths are a sign that we’re being punished for letting Gay's in our country. blah blah blah.
I sit down and think about the case, the arguments for both sides, and I unfortunately feel like it's hard to decide. It really shouldn't be that hard. But, as much as we all hate to admit it, they have their rights too. Even if what they do is incorrect.

Much like how we all talked a few months ago about how the Mosque *could* advocate a hatred for America. There’s no speculation here, we know they hate America. It's on their signs all the time.
This doesn't mean they don’t deserve the right for speech; they earn their place there just like I earn my place on this blog. It sucks and it's the exact opposite of what I think. So with that in mind we can all flip them the bird, respond back with our own signs and remind them they are bigots. It's just the way it is. If I say they can’t protest or speak out, and throw them in Jail, then what's stopping someone who disagrees with me from doing the same to me?

Freedom of speech protects the outsiders like WBC. It says they can still say what they want and not worry about being thrown in jail for it even if the populous disagrees. Even if it's wrong and they’re a terrible bunch.

While I am mentioning this I have to ask why doesn't Fox or MSNC or CNN talk about this case? It's a big deal at least to me. Their home base is in my backyard, I have to see those signs when I go to school or simply drive down the street.
Anyway, this is about the first Amendment and if this goes too far or not. This is questioning the Constitution, so why isn't this being mentioned? Too controversial? Is that what it is Media? You can’t report this story because if you say the wrong thing you may lose viewers? It's not about reporting the news anymore it's about viewership and keeping the viewers happy even if it means not reporting about something that may upset you. So how am I supposed to trust any of you cable news channels if your afraid to report a story outside your comfort zone or admit the other party is right on Fox or on MSNBC.
Sorry, going into a Tangent here. (TangentX haha) To wrap it up folks...we are able to say what we want...and if we’re told not too they become the oppressors...just like if we go against our word and tell WestBoro they cant protest then we ourselves become the oppressors.

Agree with me? Disagree? Let me know in the comments below. Would love to hear from my reader(s).

Why is different considered bad?

So...Carl Paladino is trying to capture the ever so important extreme religious groups that dress like Amish people on speed vote. Of course, this little group are against gay marriage and like any good politician Carl appeals to that group just so the next time he talks to the opposing group he can change his position to get their votes too.


You tell me, is this better for our kids, Carl?



Now this is nothing new, and I really shouldn't talk about it, but then he went to the Today show where he started spewing his usual grotesque stupidity. He pointed out that a Gay Parade is no place for a child. Maybe he's right, getting involved that young is wrong, you know why? BECAUSE I DONT KNOW ANY KID OUT THERE WHO WILL JUST WILLINGLY WALK AROUND FOR HOURS AND HOLD SIGNS WITH A COUPLE HUNDRED TO THOUSANDS OF OTHERS.

Again, better for you Carl? (This sort of hate should NOT be happening in America!)

That's just forcing your kid to do something which, (I was a kid, still am to a lot of people), I don’t want too do so why should they?

Nonetheless we know what Carl meant by his comment.

I got news for you Carl and other misinformed older generations, kids know about Gay's. They acknowledge their existence. In fact, I'm going to go further here, in grade school I learned more about sex, gays, etc. in my six years at elementary school than at any other time in my life. You really think that a class with thirty children that not one is a little aware of these type of things and don’t spew what they know or are told.

It's funny, actually, I think Carl, Christine, and the entire cult I mentioned earlier should be wrapped up and taken to a local elementary school. I think they would actually learn a thing or too about this generation.
They know about Gay people. Sorry, nothing you can do, however what I do need to point out is what they say about Gay's seem to come from their parents. You know Kids, they’re like parrots.
No let’s talk sex. Ever notice how guys like Carl try to make it seem Gay people are just raging sexaholics and are just constantly having sex 24/7. I have a question, how the hell are they having rallies without just having sex in the middle of the streets? I thought they were going at it all the time. I also want to ask, so frickin what if they do it 24/7? Not my problem or business.
Ironically though, we hear a tragic event at the Washington Bridge of a young man from Rutgers University jumped to his eventual death. He was gay and was recorded having sex with another male. That's another person ashamed of there sexuality, dying.

RIP Tyler Clementi

Yeah being Gay, that's a choice. I don’t know about you, but if I were to choose to be Gay I'd drop the act ages ago and wouldn't have committed suicide.
Isn't it obvious, people hate what they don’t understand. They don’t’ know, they can’t comprehend this business of Gay's, they can’t understand why someone would do that. So because they can’t understand they say it's wrong… it's bad.

You shouldn't do it because I don’t understand it, that’s their big message?
It's just like saying, "Hey, I'm a different color from you, but this is me so therefore I'm the right color". Then again, as I write down that comparison, I remember the people I'm talking about and realize that, sadly, this is how some of them do think of skin color.

Being different isn't bad but ignorance is.

http://www.thetrevorproject.org/



An idle world (because I couldn't leave you with that image of those poor kids above.)



Republicans are messing up again.

Hello blog, what's up? I'll tell you what's up, Democrats polling. Support has once again gone up for the November election for Democrats. Of course, they have a lot of work to still do, but it still shows that we despise Republicans. Unlike what everyone else is saying that we have once again turned 180 degrees from the previous Election to now.

It's kind of a surprise since Democrats aren't hitting very hard and how hysterical it is that Republicans are destroying themselves through bestiality E-mails, and informing your state that you in fact are not a witch.

By the way, if you go to Christine O’Donnell’s campaign website you will find that her answers to every issue are summed up in one sentence. It still baffles me how she won her primary.

High Tax bad Low Tax Good (Insert a few contractions) and you'll pretty much get her answer to everything.

Speaking of disapproval, last week Sarah Palin sat in the front row of “Dancing with the Stars”. She was interviewed and around that time there were some Boo's. Now “Dancing with the Stars” says they were booing another contestant’s scores. I re-watched this clip and I don’t think live crowds have thirty second delays. Her score was given then Boo's erupted seconds later they were not instant.

What was happening off camera at the time, however, was Mr. Whatever-the-hell-his-name-is that can’t buy a funny line sat down next to Palin therefore causing the Boo's. I point this out because live crowds are the most brainless bunch of people in the world. They will cheer for ANYONE with star power as long as they are in front of them. If you’re getting booed LIVE by a bunch of boring ballerinas you don’t have a very good chance in 2012, sorry.

What “Dancing with the Stars” CAN’T deny is how Bristol almost got eliminated and when she became safe boo's erupted then too. Sorry, there were no strange occurrences around that time that would cause the crowd to boo other than the dislike for the Palin’s.
I laugh at both these parties. The Democrats are playing so weak it's not even funny. The President himself has to campaign for his people because they can’t construct any type of campaign against their extremely flawed opponents.
Honestly, I think my seven year old brother could defeat these Republicans. Make the fact that they want to take Social Security an issue, no? State the fact that the Bush tax Cuts will cost three times more than the stimulus, no. Hell, that’s not even talking about how some of these candidates say this is a Christian Nation or how STUPID Sharon Angle is for saying she doesn't believe the Constitution states there is no separation from the Church or State.

I also want to point out how a main point for Republicans is just to point out when Democrats vote for something Obama does. It's like some kind of Skin Rash to them or contamination. Trying to help better our country over than agreeing with a Liberal that's an election loss. It really shows how dumb and comical these elections have reached. We’re at the point where they don’t even DEBATE anymore. Honestly, these guys don’t even debate each other they just pass around ads. What happened to the debates? The only one I've heard about is where that chick's, who’s face is about to fall off, from Arizona saying those moronic comments about severed bodies in the Arizona desert!
Then she chickened out and refused to debate anymore and for good reason. I would have dropped out of that campaign and then go to the desert and hope the nicest thing to happen to me was being a severed body in the middle of the Arizona desert.
So behind all the smoke and mirrors, ladies and gentleman, is this Election…well, it sucks they don’t impress me very much Liberals will continue to just call them crazy even if most of us are insane now. And Republicans will put together one line sentences for why Health Care is bad on their websites.

It's all about the Benjamins

So I sat down with my highly trained economic team today and I have discovered the cure to stop high taxes! It was there all along and I just discovered the way to stop the Taxation of our people!


It starts with the income of the common man.
Carry the one. Add fifty, times it by four...
And you get…Zero (rough estimate)


That’s when you realize how much you can be taxed if you have no money! Nothing, it makes sense! Quit your jobs, give up your stock, leave your cooperation, and change your name to Frankie Muniz. You’re flat broke!


You'll finally be free from taxation. It's a small price to pay to make sure you don’t lose your summer home or have to switch from that nice Chinese food catering to that nasty Indonesian catering.


So that's why I have proposed an idea -- visionary votes for the Republican candidates. I mean, they already nearly bankrupted us with Bush so let's have um do it again. Then you can’t get taxed.


It's not hard to be a peasant, either, other than learning how to cook, clean, do laundry, be self hygienic. *tears start welling up* No Maids or servants…no three course m-m-eals.


Oh, damn it, it's back to the drawing board. *wipes my eyes* How do people live that way? Self independence is sickening!


So, even though you get a bite taken out of your billion dollar profits per year, I guess it's still just slightly better than that Joe guy who makes 10.50 an hr. Just a little better. I mean they get everything, don't they? They don’t have to pay massive amounts of money to the Government while you suffer by paying for sitting in your summer home drinking some scotch.


That's why I have decided I am NOT giving up my trillion dollar corporation.  If I had one, that is...

EDUCATION CRISIS AMERICA!

Psst, there’s an education crisis in America. I know! It took until we heard Tom Brokaw’s gravelly voice to finally announce it. (Screw you Brian Williams.) America -- this education crisis -- ask yourself…is it all that bad? I for one am against thinking. I joined the anti-think movement back in the day. It's hosted by Paris Hilton and funded by Lindsay Lohan’s drug dealer.

Thinking just complicates things, people. It causes headaches. Second of all, I wouldn't have to pretend and use big words for my blog to look sophisticated <--- Haha, see what I mean. I can finally speak in my natural tongue.

Me speak English good. You speak English badder.

Now, folks, don’t just take my word for it. Glenn Beck also agrees with me and if Glenn Beck agrees with me that means over twenty million people in his head also agreed with me.

Glenn Beck was also brilliant to point out that or founders were in fact home schooled, and that public education is wrong and evil. Just like those damn liberal colleges.
It's not like public education wasn't around back before we were an established nation or anything. We used to take the old homes of Indians and ransack them to learn about how the Amish were already out dated and why powdered wigs are racist.

You mean to tell me I have to think now in the real world? I just sat behind some brainy kids in high school. And when they weren't there I would just write random answers and turn it in and get full credit just for doing it.
Nothing wrong with that system I mean it's not like we should grade a student based on how well he understands a piece of material. That would be discouraging and racist! Furthermore, why would we need Congress to continue to achieve everything we ever wanted and work hard together to establish laws to help each other in or society? I like choosing some guy who cheated through law school than actually going to law school myself.

I prefer to just nod my head and vote based on who has the coolest slogan. I think in 2012 I'll go for Obama's new slogan: change you may or may not discover.

Thinking…who needs it?

26 year old stealers

“Oh my gosh!” That's what I said when I heard the first part of the socialism package – I mean the healthcare package – became effective.

I mean, it's nothing important. Just kids being able to be on their parent’s healthcare until age 26. Once again they promote sheer laziness! All this does is ensure Jon Stewart fans live longer, it's not like it benefits anyone. You're only 26 once! All those other years in between, what about us? It's…it's… it's AGE WARFARE!

Well, unless you’re subconscious about your age, then you've been 26 for twenty or so years.

Now, I'm told this benefits college kids. Please, college? What an elitist idea! It makes up 0.00001% of the population. (I got these numbers from Wikipedia.)

So, that's why I've drawn you a little visual aid to help you out here.

You + Money

= LOST to HEALTH

I mean, what have 26 year olds done for you? Nothing! They breathe your same air and usually end up infecting it by dirty gases or lack of showers in their dorms.

So get on environmentalists YEEHA!

So I am now proposing a way to expose Obama's socialistic insane age favourtism ways!

We all sign up, say that we’re twenty six, just like we tell our children or neighbors.

It's harmless to lie to the government. Nothing can go wrong and we can have our parents take care of our health.

Happy 26th birthday!

The Name Game

Hello blog, today I'm going to present my case. If the GOP wins in November they are still losers in the long run. For one, like most of you may know. They’re divided – Tea Party and Moderates. However, if you look even deeper you can see they’re even MORE divided.


There are so many things they disagree on and then try to say they’re a party.
You got fundamentalists, libertarians, Tea baggers, Sarah Palin (yes, she gets her own category).

All of these elements and they’re primed to take the house. Their sole argument this election is to say that Democrats couldn't change and get it done. Do you expect them to not do the same with all these elements? Imagine if a Fundamentalist wanted to pass a law that said prayer is mandatory in schools. Do you expect the Libertarians to lie down and vote with them? Hell, no!
Try another one: Tea Baggers want to keep the bush Tax Cuts, now there's not so many left, but they’re still are fiscally old school. Conservatives who will say, “No we can’t do that because it costs four times more than the damn plans Obama put out” that we complained cost too much.
With all of these dysfunctions and different ideologies clashing, how can you expect them to get anything worthy done?
In the end it will just be the failure of the GOP. The people, if my predictions are correct, will see that they can’t accomplish anything either and hop back to the Democrat ticket, give up on voting, or somehow stay republican which it's on them if they do.

So, what do you do at that point? Your party is dysfunctional, you can’t pass the legislation you want too and get heated within your own party. So you split Tea Baggers probably first, then Fundies and even the old school conservatives. The Libertarians. And we end up with these multiple parties
Even more so with the idea Newt has to shut down the federal Government BECAUSE THAT WORKED OH SO WELL FOR YOU IN THE 90'S NEWT.
Now, granted, Liberals have this problem too. Blue Collars etc, but they don’t have a massive entity at the moment pushing them and gaining support by the day (Tea Baggers). If the Tea Baggers get their way what does that show to the other factions? Well if they’re on their own Libertarians can be too! Or Fundamentalists can too!

And so on and so on until the three letters GOP become...an afterthought.

The World According to TangentX

50th post! 50th post! 50th post!
Hello blog, yes it's my 50th post! I never understood why things like 50 or 100 or 200 or 1000 are any different from the number in front of them. But as custom dictates it's a celebration. An extravaganza, a smorgasbord! A casserole of laughs.
I will do something different; I'm going to talk about me today and not the tea party or the liberals.
I'll start with politics; I was raised in a family that couldn't give a damn about politics. My Dad is a conspiracy theorist and a man who has given up hope on any president or public figure. My Mom doesn't have time for politics. She works a lot, has to care for three kids and my Dad.
So I wasn't forced into any views I adapted them myself. I read my textbooks and saw how the system worked. I, just like so many "youngins", paid attention to the 2008 presidential election. However I didn't buy Obama's speeches and just knowing McCain agrees with Bush on a lot of things turned me away.
So, as the election died down and the "youngins" slowly faded back into there usual lifestyle of stalking Justin Bieber, I stuck around. 2012 I will be able to vote, so I wanted to find a party. I initially went with the Democratic Party because I only heard about Bush and McCain most of the time. I disliked both of them so I said Ok lesser of two evils.
So I met some Liberals on the internet, at school, then I noticed how I didn't fit in with the Liberals. I wasn't a vegan, I wasn't for higher taxes. I'm fine with the second amendment and the list goes on. So, I didn't want to consider myself a Liberal anymore,
So this time I looked more at the conservative values and that is where I found the choices of Small Government, low taxes, less spending, people that value the constitution no matter there religion, party, or what they felt was morally right or wrong. It was in the interest of the constitution and I really liked that.
Then the Tea Party came, and so did being generalized. Anytime I'd say I was Conservative I was labeled racist, a fundy, Bill O'reilly lover, Fox News watcher, all of it. No matter how much you would plead or present your case of old fashioned conservative values you would have to face the images on Fox or in the media of Palin being a total idiot.
So, I went down the middle. I'm not in either party. I then saw that people are willing to throw support just for being in their party it makes me sick. No matter who it is and how split their ideology of conservatives are or some Liberals are. They will still go for them, and not for the actual person running.
So that's how I became what I am in how I look at politics.

On the deeper more sensitive subject of Religion, it goes a lot further back and more back-and-forth and quite personal. I grew up a moderate. I was sent to church and the Sunday school system. From as early as I could remember I was always, always skeptic. I'd go into class and fight myself in my own mind saying “There's God. No there isn't.” It was a confusing time. I think the longest I could go with accepting it completely was two months.

Despite this I still went to Church and always wondered why the priest did only a few lessons or readings despite how massive the content in the bible was. I started reading it on my own and learned more about the faith I was involved with than when I went to Church. I'm not going to lie; I didn't like what I read from the parts about homosexuals to race. I didn't like it plain and simple. I think that's when I let go. I still couldn't let it go though and for a long time I blocked it out and didn't think about it until this past summer where I finally cut it and told my parents how I felt.
I didn't feel I was a good Catholic anyway. What kind of Catholic would debate his creation inside his own church? I'd sit through sermons asking if he was real. I think that was also a contributing part to becoming who I am. I let go of religion and now I'm at peace. I couldn't ask for anything more.
My Mom is religious and my Dad and I, I think, grew closer with these conversations. I learned more about my Dad and I liked it. My Mom wasn't happy about it, but thankfully accepts who I am. However I promised my Mom and my family I'd never tell some of the more Catholic members of the family how I felt. Notably my Grandma, who I love very much.
So, I close this 50th entry knowing how long I've spent here in such a small amount of time. Hope you enjoyed it so far, cheers to another 50.

TangentX

Black Magic Woman

Hello blog, so the woman of the hour, Christine O'Donnell, had a video released about her about her witchcraft ways! I only have one question, why does this even matter? I don’t see how it sways anyone and it seems fictional quite frankly or fake. However, what I do find interesting is the fact O'Donnell points out the blood on the altar's and those practices. She pretty much says they were Satanists which most aren’t.


It is funny though that she will actually lose votes for this. Some Christians are mortified by this. So you’re telling me the deciding factor of you not voting for her is witchcraft in high school? Not misinforming teens by telling them condoms do not help prevent HIV? Or to try to home run this Abstinence program that has worked soooo well.

In personal experience I know abstinence sucks. I used to be involved in a local church that promoted abstinence and I went to school with a few people, mostly girls, who went to the same church.

This school year almost all the girls that went to my church are pregnant. Yeah, abstinence, that’s a successful program.

Don’t think that's enough. Look at the demography for White Evangelical teenage boys. They are more sexually active than these racists who say minorities are the promiscuous bunch. Face it, teenagers will continue to have sex and be sexually active. Just telling them "No" isn't going to help, but you can help by informing them of safe practice. I honestly feel like a bad tape recorder repeating this stupid argument. How is it even debatable?

Furthermore, there are even those types that are really wacked out. I never understood how telling a girl at age two she could go into fire and brimstone for eternity for not doing the right thing. But learning about sex in general is forbidden at age sixteen or even in some cases all the way to the twenties.

Inform me on that one can anyone?

So witchcraft O'Donnell can you cast a spell that maybe set higher expectations for a teenager, instead of portraying them as promiscuous little balls of life. And use this belief system that says if you have high expectations for a child then they are likely to try to grasp those expectations and achieve them.

Something tells me that one isn't in your spell book.

The State of TangentX Address

Hello blog, as promised I’m going to talk about a few things that I want to get off my chest. First off I want to say how saddening it is to see my fellow Americans vote these Tea Partiers in without them giving any facts some going the whole campaign without even debating there counterpart. The fact we can now win elections just by spreading fear campaigns is disheartening.


Nonetheless I want to make a little resolution from this post onward to not call any official Tea Partier a member of the GOP. I think they go far enough to not be considered the same party. The moderate GOP is fighting this tea party. Christine O'Donnell took the win a few days ago and we have seen her get bashed by the GOP, the party she is supposed to be in.

So I want to make a little resolution that I don’t call any Tea Partier a member of the GOP, there just Tea Partiers to me nothing else. Anyway, this isn't my primary focus. not the Tea Party insanity or the faltering GOP.

I want to talk to the liberals out there.

Hi, I'm TangentX, remember a couple years ago when you fought the D.C. streets everyday with signs and colorful insight and you took the senate and house by storm? You even got your guy elected up there. Then, for whatever damn reason, you stopped after he got elected. Are you guys seriously? Are you that naive to think putting someone as the president was going to solve all the problems? Instead this false idea got planted in your heads that said, “We won game set match! We got our guy!”


No, you need to take back your streets. Libs, everyday you hear the core argument of the GOP that Obama is on a fringe and has no support. That's where you disarm that comment by taking back D.C. and doing what you did for eight years march, march, march.

But no, instead this group called the Tea Party emerged and took what Obama applied to us. "Change you can believe in". Well, things are changing, we got people who are about to enter the senate who are anti-abortion even in cases of incest and rape. How? Because they are going up against liberals who aren't willing to even fight. Are you scared? I can understand, stupid can be scary, especially when you got an evangelical on Fox saying that Liberals are going to become violent.

I still can’t comprehend how you guys haven't made social security the home run issue. Look at the statistics 90% want their social security intact, but somehow you have let these Republicans say it's draining us dry even if it has a damn surplus until 2030!

Ladies and gentlemen, if you haven't heard, if the Republicans take back Washington they plan to shut down the Federal Government. Social Security checks will be gone and a lot of other programs too. Just so they can get what they want namely the Tax breaks. The same Tax breaks that have a vast majority on the edge of people saying, “No to extending them”. The same Tax Breaks that would cost more than the Stimulus.

Chalk one up for the Tea Baggers

Christine O’Donnell silenced everyone again by defeating GOP's Castle last night. A few things going through my head is that this is terrible for the GOP to lose a good shot at Delaware with a moderate, but this is also terrible for all of us. We make our jokes about the Tea Party and how insane they are. Just note they should be taken seriously folks. There winning primaries we said they had no chance now there winning primaries. The same people are saying they will lose in November. So far you're 0-1. Your predictions aren't going so well.


People are listening to what these guys have to say, and it doesn't matter what or who they are now. This crop of people, O’Donnell extremely confused on Sex, she offers a cure to fix gay's for crying out loud. We got a guy in New York giving racist jokes on E-mails and porn, as well as bestiality, and he's doing well in New York. We got this crop of candidates all across the board of total insanity and scandals. And people DON’T CARE! Biggest Medicare fraud ever, sure you're in. Living off campaign money for the last three years and not paying your employees, got my vote. Someone, just for being as stupid as Palin, worshipped. List goes on and on, Obama said change is gonna come and people are saying "No, you haven't changed anything." I'm looking around today at these Tea Partiers and I think they stole his slogan from you guys and took matters into their own hands.

I'll have A TON more on this tomorrow. I'm going to touch a lot of topics that I feel relate to all this. I think I might have to make it two parts because I want to hit a lot of things so have a good one and see you tomorrow.

Self Interests

Hello blog, last week I had mentioned a small business bill that would help over 90% of small businesses to hire and get on track. This bill was built with Republicans and Democrats.


Republicans, like RNC chairman Michael Steele, loved the idea of opening capital for Small business and thought it would help tremendously. Then...whoops Obama passed the bill. Then Michael Steel came back the next week to say this bill was a TERRIBLE idea. Just seven days he changes his heart completely about a bill that helps the people they claim to support all the time.

With the lack of options, to not look completely stupid to even the blind people, Fox and Friends quickly solved our problems. By talking about Small Business and how making 250 grand a year is not much...Not much? The average household makes So far less than that. The interesting statistic that comes out of all this, however, is that people making over 250 grand are the…Yes, top two percent!

We live in a time of great distrust of Washington. My distrust goes beyond the campaign slogans about how they appeal to the people and how they will change Washington. It goes to protecting personal interest and your party and NOT the American people that YOU ALL CHIME ABOUT all the time.

You always go on to say how we’re hurting. Yes we’re hurting, but things like this Bill take so long to pass just because the GOP wouldn't swallow some pride! It's a joke, and what will they do next hmm? My guess is they will then say this Bill was ALL their idea and that the Dems tried to reject it.

And what is small business to the GOP anyway? Making 250 grand isn't rich? Only a handful make that much in this country. To them Millionaires are small business, I guess, just remember the next time you hear about how they represent small business to approach it from a skeptic standpoint, because I question it greatly. Instead of getting us back up you want to make sure you win in November. Instead of getting new hirers you want to make sure the Dems fail. Instead of working together to represent the people you sell out to greed. That's what I MEAN by politician’s gone Washington.

Fail Fridays

Hello blog, Friday Failures you me now go.


#5 the GOP, the ones that aren't drinking burning hot insanity tea, you know the ones that actually aren’t insane. These guys are pretty wounded. You’re fighting your own party against the Tea Party and fighting dems at the same time. You keep losing your tickets to the Tea Party and you try to cover them up by making them appear mainstream. But long behold the Internet the place where quotes and tape never die.

Soon Nora O’Donnell might beat out Castle the long time conservative who has yet to lose a single election. Won’t that be interesting.

#4 Enthusiasm is always encouraged especially at baseball games. Throw in a foul ball and it's borderline spastic. This guy though...if he would have just calmed down he could of avoided a lot of pain, a lot of moving and a lot of embarrassment.

Ok first of all look around him there’s like one guy for the next twelve rows why are you diving like it's a huge battle for it your alone. Second you miss the ball then you mishandle it again and it falls out to where someone has to hand it to you. Once again could've been avoidable.

#3 Back to the hopeful out of Delaware, O’Donnell. Today she challenged her opponent Castle telling him to "quit cooking, and put on your man pants." Just to say that even though she's running against this guy that her comment had nothing to do with the campaign.

Isn't talking anytime about your opponent have to do with your campaign?

#2 Glenn Beck and Palin has a shared failure together. These two plan to hold an event in Alaska on 9/11. For the American people! The people willing to pay $240+ dollars. Oddly enough, though, where the proceedings go is unknown.....Right.

Beer is being provided! In fact, it's mandatory because it's necessary to be intoxicated to make people believe 9/11 was a plot in which every single Muslim in the United States was involved.

#1 Words cannot describe how terrible this person is, but here we go.

Linda Parker, a principle out of a Texas School, suspended a student for coming into school with red eyes. She reported him and got him suspended for three days. Then he was expelled and was told he would be moved to a different school.

Then there was this thing called drug testing in which he proved that he had NOT taken any drugs.

Oh, and if you were wondering why his eyes were red. It's because his father was stabbed to death recently. Probably, I don’t know, crying?

Oh and in expected reasoning the kid? He doesn't have to change schools, but he's still suspended for three days justice nice!

Who are they really hurting?

Hello blog, it's come to a lot of our attention that on September 11th there will be an international burn the Koran day. This idea came from a Florida church and quickly has spread to the Middle East. Anger has already escalated in the Middle East. Petraeus himself also said this would put soldiers in danger if they saw the Koran being burned.

This all of course is in response to the Ground Zero Mosque. While personally I'm not going to lie and say how offending it would be to burn the Qur'an, I'm not Muslim, I wouldn't know. It is interesting to me however that to these people who are "offended" by the Mosque, who wish to participate in this burning of the Koran, know full well Muslims have the right to build the Mosque. HOWEVER, in your response with the burnings, you do realize what YOU plan to do is banned?

In some states you can make a fire in your yard sure, but you can’t throw books into the fire or other flammable things. Already the fire department plans to be at this event to put out any of the Korans being burned. Fascinating, to get even with something perfectly legal you do something illegal, congratulations.

Getting back to the sensitivity of the Mosque being at Ground Zero, the first amendment does not also come with sensitivity connotation rules. You can’t just say well that might hurt feelings we can’t do that. THAT’S THE POINT of the first amendment where unpopular things are allowed even if the majority sounds them out. They have the right too just like we all have the right to criticize it like you already have. Just like I have the right to criticize the criticizers for being fear mongers.

If they own the land they can do whatever they want to. Hell, they can even openly say this Mosque is to honor those who died the attacks on 9/11. That's there right to do that if they own the land. We all seem to have forgotten the purpose of the 9/11 attacks. To strip us of our freedoms, to take away our liberty and freedom! Look at what's transpiring in Manhattan. There accomplishing what they set out to do to us on that day.

If you burn the Koran, you don’t like the Mosque, so obviously you mourned at 9/11, like Petraeus warned the REAL radicals in the Middle East are going to see that. Now you tell me what could happen in retaliation. Don’t forget ladies and gentlemen, while you’re fighting moderate American Muslims in our own backyard, the true radicals see the hatred of Islam and the burning of there Koran. It becomes a propaganda field day and they will show the few middle easterners who want democracy, who want freedom, and are only moderate muslins, and you give them that and you pass on a whole new line of recruits of hatred towards the USA.

Good luck

What's best for the people?

"They've attacked us, sabotaged us, abducted us--" Ops, wrong speech

Hello blog, yesterday President Obama made his speech in Wisconsin about future plans for the economy. Among the highway jobs and railroads there’s another portion I want to bring to you attention. The money sent to corporations—small business and big corporations.
Billions of dollars granted to corporations to invest into equipment and billions more sent to small businesses for relief. Sounds familiar, doesn't it? Wouldn't that go with the republican agenda? Right, so if we apply a little logic that would mean Republicans would agree and give props to Obama for doing something they have wanted to do since 2008.

Nope, sorry wrong they got you again!

Obama was instead criticized from all sides about this new plan. It was also suggested that this plan be approached with skepticism. Basically, don’t do this plan, Obama, until republicans take over the senate. So then they can pass it and claim the credit.
Like I've said before, ladies and gentlemen, this is politics at its worst. When you put aside your parties principles in which people look to VOTE FOR YOU or to look past helping the American people! Just to protect your party’s interest. That is politics at its worst easily.
Speaking of attacking Obama, I think we have heard the common argument on "Obamacare" that it shouldn't be done because the majority disagrees. Which wouldn't be all that bad of a statement if the Republicans didn’t want to extend Bush’s Tax cuts. (Only 35% of Americans care about or think will help in anyway.)
I don’t understand the logic of saying because the majority doesn't approve it shouldn't be done. Isn't that politics 101. Douchebaggery, do things to get re-elected even if people don’t like it. And since when is always agreeing with the majority a good thing. The majority a number of times have been wrong. Slavery, Women’s rights you name it. All looked down upon in its town and disliked by the majority. Now am I saying they should ignore the majority? No, but trying to make a point out of it over one issue even though your party does it too makes very little sense to me.
Face it folks, Obama was spot on in his speech when he said Republicans would say the sky isn't blue, and that is what I hate about the campaign season. Let's move back to the issues not hide the Mosque from Ground Zero to make issues out of something that should be settled with the fact they have the constitutional right. No, we will still talk about it though instead of things like Sharon Angle wanting to have every pregnancy investigated. Everyone loves Washington!

That is So Mainstream

Hello Blog, hope you had a good Labor Day weekend.


This will be pretty short, I'm kind of busy and it's late. Anyway, so I see on Fox News that they like to claim they aren't mainstream media. However, they go on to show proudly that they are the most watched news network with, of course, O'Reilly on top of the list. How does this work? I mean, Mainstream means common ideas. If you’re the most watched news network out of the big three then wouldn't that make you mainstream? To me, Mainstream media doesn't exist. If your on National Television, and get views into the hundreds of thousands to the millions. If you’re on TV and people watch your show then there’s a good chance they agree with your ideas. If you have it into the millions like some of these guys do then that idea is shared with millions.

Wouldn't that make you "Mainstream"?
That's just my opinion though. Let's ask the readers, though. Some reader interaction is always fun. How would you define the "Mainstream Media"? Would Fox news fit into the "Mainstream Media"? Then, of course, how was your Labor Day weekend? Did you spend it as well as I did, in that I mean catch up on procrastinated school work?

Fail Friday

Hello blog, it's Friday which means it's time for the top 5 failures of the week.

Let's get right into it.

You're in a timeout, you lying liar.

#5 Glenn Beck was caught LYING, what a shocker. Remember the whole restore honor spiel, where he said he touched the George Washington inaugural speech. Yeah, apparently that was a LIE. Really guys?! Out of ALL the things Beck has said over the years which are a little less than truthful, with his statistics and "infinite knowledge" on the founding fathers, this is the one thing we catch him on. Something that everyone knows is obviously false. However, he still fails for lying at a restoring the honor rally. Honor knows its boundaries and it goes hand-in-hand with lying.

I have 5 words for you. War Zone! Oh, wait...

#4 Newt Gingrich now has a new idea for the Park 51 Mosque. IT’S A WAR ZONE. He wants it identified as a warzone to prevent the Mosque from being constructed. The loophole? He doesn't say where it ends. So, just assuming from what I have seen lately, Tennessee is far too close to Park 51.

"I would like...to say...how much...eh, forget it."

#3 Jan Brewer...Your debate earlier this week is legend... Sorry, I forgot what I was going to say during my opening statement. Now she says she refuses to debate anymore. Jeez, wonder why?



#2 Joe Miller!

This Fail Friday is brought to you by Jesus, Mary  Joseph. Beat that Joe!

You had a big upset win earlier in Alaska. Looks like you got a lot of things going your way, including God. Yes, it’s official. God is now, according to Miller, funding his campaign! All this time I thought he was backed by his father, the logo on Brawny towels.

#1 The U.S. Open security officials, spectators, the woman and her elderly man failed this week. Congratulations for winning FAILURE of the week, ya’ll. So, in case you didn’t see it, this young man is talking trash to some woman and an older man. Boy those Tennis matches get really rowdy don’t they? All that bottled water really gets you in a daze. So they start arguing then out of nowhere the older gentleman stumbles onto the younger man and the younger man pushes him down the steps! This did take a few minutes with many spectators watching. So for security to answer a screaming sparring match with hundreds of spectators around is TOO much I guess.

The woman then goes to try to strangle the younger man and is quickly broken up. Now this younger man is clearly a D-bag. But if we hit or try to strangle anyone who's ever argued with you I think you'd have a lot of charges against you. What is interesting is the spectators are yelling for the YOUNGER man to be thrown out. Not the elder gentleman and the woman. Furthermore, it seemed the older man he fell on his own rather than the man pushing him. I couldn't understand why anyone would resort to using violence in front of hundreds at a tennis match. To anyone also feeling sorry for the older man, why? He attacked the younger man first and it looked to me that the older man fell on his own and didn't need much help from the younger man to fall down. Does age suddenly justify whether or not you can hit someone without facing repercussions?

WARNING: ADULT LANGUAGE

Drill Baby Drill

Hello blog, once again there was another oil accident. This time not as catastrophic, no one was hurt, and it was done via platform instead of deepwater horizon.


why is this worth talking about? The coast guard reported a spill about one hundred feet wide about 200 miles west of BP's massive spill. And then what happened? Four hours later they say there was NO SPILL. How exactly do you say so accurately that there was one hundred feet wide then four hours later say “Ops, never mind”?

I'm not trying to be some conspiracy theorist, but oil companies and telling the truth to the media mix about as well as…well, oil and water. BP lied to the president themselves about the size of their spill. So I think it's fair to say there COULD be another spill.

Enough assumptions, though. I want to talk about the hypocrites who tell Obama to do something about these accidents. Yet, if he does something he will be called a socialist and supporter of big government because these corporations are NOT owned by the Government. They OWN the government!

Let’s resume. If Obama would have "done" something like he was "supposed to" wouldn't he then be called a socialist for being involved in corporation and regulating them? If he doesn't do anything and lets corporations lie out their teeth as it tries to get out of this mess anyway possible by doing as little as they can.

Which are you guys going to pick? You tie his hands down once again and no matter what he does he is bad or wrong. Don’t worry, though, we have new ways of hitting Obama now. I've heard that Obama himself is causing these explosions. Yes people are now saying that since 2 explosions have occurred within the last five months during Obama's presidency it is EVER SO clear that Obama has caused it.

Even though there was about two to three every year including in 2007 when there was four. So yeah...whatever? Instead of going after the real problem – the inspectors of these rigs who come from an industry that doesn’t care nor look until these kind of things happen – let’s just blame Obama.

Trying to enforce and get better inspectors and tighter regulations? I do not mean make MORE REGULATIONS. I mean being STRICTER about them. Making more regulations just oh, I don’t know, gives more rules for these companies not to follow.

Who am I kidding? Just blame Obama.

It's Over!

The combat mission is over in Iraq! “It's over!” said that guy who uses big words on T.V. I think there needs to be a feature on our televisions that makes us hear what we want: "Uh, look, I'm a Muslim and I uh was not born in this country."

Audience at home: "Oh I knew it!"

I honestly did not listen to anything this man had to say because he wants to keep social security and that's wrong. We should work until we die. It's good ethnics and morals, keeps the youngins off the street and uneducated just like I like um so they will vote for me!

Nonetheless, he says it's over. Our combat mission is over; no more MG's blowing through human flesh promoting democracy! Instead we are going to build their Government up BOREEEE. How will CNN get viewers from that now? Coming up: guys in suits talking about how to stop the violence *Snore.*

This is not why I am blogging tonight, however. Tonight I want to talk about why we should be worshiping Mr. Bush! Without him, he wouldn't have made this all possible cause without him he wouldn't have had four different reasons set over seven long years on why we are there! Really America?! You need FOUR reasons now? Four dishonest, ever changing, and lacking in evidential reasoning to raise arms against another country, all to promote peace by blowing up their homes up. You had me at explosions, Mr. Bush.

First we had 9/11 we went in Iraq to fight the Iraqi's after 9/11 because they had 0 to do with 9/11 sounds fair to me. Then we had the threat of weapons of mass destruction! And they weren’t there, but how dare you say they couldn't be just because there is no evidence. Have you found Mr. Osama? For all you know it could be under his mattress, think about that one Osama could be hiding in Afghanistan with weapons of mass destruction preparing to blow us up!...Afghanistan...not Iraq...Wait?

Third, we were told Saddam Hussein was a bad man. You’re darn right he was. Good job Bush, I love you so much. That took some real investigating, I tell ya.

Fourth, turns out Saddam was ruining oil for the U.N. and we were protecting the U.N. cause we are the big man on campus who protects the little U.N. We’re that hero that gets told by the U.N. not to war with Iraq, but we do it for them anyway. They don’t actually mean what they say I think it was opposite day that day.

So not only was Bush building mountains of evidence to destroy the Middle East, he was also in good spirits about playing opposite day. How could we also forget, we are also a lot safer. We have wire taps now and we now get to listen to what our neighbors have to say. You say invasion of privacy I say bah to that. Unless, of course, you have something to hide! Think about it. There could be a serial killer living next door whose house smells like dog.

The Patriot Act, too! We now plan ahead by putting people away who look the role, but haven't acted it out yet. Better safe than sorry right?

So, my lovely reader, who’s responsible? The guy who protected us so well by giving us colorful and lovely narratives that persuades us to have Dick Cheney breathing on the end of our phone lines. Or the boring guy who pulls us out of combat missions and doesn't tell cool stories, and actually applies this extreme left wing thought called "Logic" to pulling us out of a seven year war. I know my answer.

Rally Time!

Hello blog, sorry for the lack of content. Been away for the last few days, but rest assured I am here now, so please continue not reading me.


As we are all aware Glenn Beck had his “Restoring Honor” rally Saturday pulling an unknown amount of people. Some say 80,000 others say 300,000. I say about three billion. I mean, Beck said the Holy Spirit was going to take over him, who wouldn't want to see that?! Another person claiming to be one with the Holy Spirit, yeah right, try fifth time this week.

According to my secret resources, ninety five percent of this crowd was only there for free tea on Saturday’s, and are secretly English born people.

Nonetheless, Beck and Palin put on a nice little show where Beck set the record straight. This was NOT for politics. It was for the Glenn Beck bank account and done for the viewers. Well done brother. Nothing says Holy Spirit like conning a couple thousand people into thinking your a prophet. Just ask Pat Robertson and the 700 club of many Benjamins.

Just how brilliant and amazing were these supporters who came together to sweat, breathe heavy, and look in awe at how Beck is able to talk with just a little microphone with no strings attached.

"HOW DOES HE DO IT?!" Well on everyone’s favorite morning progam-- with more plastic people than your kids Fisher price set -- The Today Show, they caught up with these fantastic supporters of free will and justice.

"We need to uhh uhh uhh protect our uhh constitution." A Brilliant statement indeed, full of wisdom and not just force fed through Fox News Channel at all. These people are totally right. Now, let's just speak theoretically here and say that if some sort of Islamic center from – let's say an abandoned Burlington Coat Factory – held worship for Muslims near Ground Zero. These types of people would be the ones in support of that Mosque because they protect The Constitution. Damn right, Tea Party!

Then we had those socialists across town doing some off the wall unfounded march for MLK which really has no relationship with MLK. Obviously, “I have a Dream” was about Christianity, equality, and not civil rights. What nutjobs those people are, Mr. Al Sharpton.

Then expecting to see some insane brawl at the end where both rallies met into each other (Beck's leading/Sharpton’s approaching), we instead heard boring chants back-and-forth about not drinking Tea. I'm sorry, but it's so delicious it tastes like restriction and big business with a tad of oil. It tastes like the solution to our economic problems!

Good try, Mr. Sharpton, I believe you were trumped. Maybe next time you can sell your soul for six months out of the year to shamelessly promote your rally. You should dye your hair blonde along with your envy of our hero Mr. Beck.

Twisted Reality

Reality television, I never really cared for it. I'm not sure why there’s a Real Housewives D.C. when the Liberals and Conservatives have had their own Dog-and-Pony show for so long. But, oops, I'm rambling.

For ALL you reality TV fans out there who like to see The Situation’s abs or the fist fights, how about bombings? Yes, G4 is now promoting a new show (inspired by the movie “The Hurt Locker”) for this spring where cameras follow American troops as they watch them disarm a bomb or let it EXPLODE and kill them.

The spokeswoman also emphasized on the killing part because they know that the killing of American troops on camera will really punch in those ratings.

This is the doomsday for T.V. If I had to choose between Levi Johnston’s show and this show I'm choosing the boring Levi. Maybe I'm wrong on this one, but I'd rather watch an over confident man who will never achieve anything be on television show than watching REAL American soldiers get blown up. I probably wouldn't be bothered by a actual documentation of a camera crew following soldiers to see them disarm bombs or meet their demise. I personally wouldn't watch it, but I wouldn't speak out against it.

However, when I see a television station plugging this show and emphasizing the bomb exploding, killing the soldiers for pure profit and ratings, then yes I have a problem. There’s no plug along the lines of “Let’s see what it's like to be in this war or just talking about disarming the bomb”. No, they went full swing with the intention of showing these soldiers blow up.

Just for profit and revolutionizing reality TV. This is awful to me.