It is funny though that she will actually lose votes for this. Some Christians are mortified by this. So you’re telling me the deciding factor of you not voting for her is witchcraft in high school? Not misinforming teens by telling them condoms do not help prevent HIV? Or to try to home run this Abstinence program that has worked soooo well.
In personal experience I know abstinence sucks. I used to be involved in a local church that promoted abstinence and I went to school with a few people, mostly girls, who went to the same church.
This school year almost all the girls that went to my church are pregnant. Yeah, abstinence, that’s a successful program.
Don’t think that's enough. Look at the demography for White Evangelical teenage boys. They are more sexually active than these racists who say minorities are the promiscuous bunch. Face it, teenagers will continue to have sex and be sexually active. Just telling them "No" isn't going to help, but you can help by informing them of safe practice. I honestly feel like a bad tape recorder repeating this stupid argument. How is it even debatable?
Furthermore, there are even those types that are really wacked out. I never understood how telling a girl at age two she could go into fire and brimstone for eternity for not doing the right thing. But learning about sex in general is forbidden at age sixteen or even in some cases all the way to the twenties.
Inform me on that one can anyone?
So witchcraft O'Donnell can you cast a spell that maybe set higher expectations for a teenager, instead of portraying them as promiscuous little balls of life. And use this belief system that says if you have high expectations for a child then they are likely to try to grasp those expectations and achieve them.
Something tells me that one isn't in your spell book.
No comments:
Post a Comment